Introduction
The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta has announced a significant update to its GDPNow forecasting model, adjusting for the recent spike in US gold imports. This change aims to address distortions in GDP estimates caused by the rising stockpiles of gold, which have widened the US trade deficit and skewed previous nowcasts.
Impact of Gold Imports on GDP Estimates
The Atlanta Fed's GDPNow model provides real-time estimates of quarterly GDP growth using a methodology similar to that of the US Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). However, as noted by Patrick Higgins, a policy adviser and economist at the bank, the model often diverged from professional forecasts due to its treatment of gold imports and certain GDP subcomponents. According to data from USA Trade Online, US imports of physical gold surged from $2.08 billion in November 2024 to $28.69 billion in January 2025, before slightly declining to $22.96 billion in February 2025. This influx artificially depressed GDP estimates by inflating the trade deficit, as the BEA excludes gold from the investment component of GDP calculations.
Details of the New Model
To rectify this, the Atlanta Fed has developed a new model that better accounts for gold movements compared to the BEA's approach. As of April 17, the alternative model forecasts a modest 0.1% decrease in first-quarter GDP (seasonally adjusted annual rate), a stark contrast to the -2.2% decline predicted by the standard model. The bank began using this gold-adjusted model in early March and plans to make it the default forecasting tool after April 29. Higgins also highlighted that gold imports could continue to distort estimates in the second quarter, justifying the urgent switch to the new model.
Analysis and Perspective
While the adjustment appears necessary given the unprecedented surge in gold imports, questions remain about the long-term reliability of the new model. Gold trade fluctuations are often tied to global economic uncertainties or speculative investments, which are inherently volatile. Will the model remain robust if gold imports stabilize or decline sharply? Additionally, the divergence from BEA methodology raises concerns about consistency in GDP reporting across institutions. On the positive side, this move demonstrates the Atlanta Fed’s adaptability in refining economic indicators to reflect real-world complexities, potentially setting a precedent for other forecasting models to address niche but impactful factors.